Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299171 ------- Additional Comments From dsugar@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-06 13:39 EST ------- Ok, I'm not sure why the didn't match. But I have made a clean source tarball and fresh src.rpm. I checked each file that was not correctly licensed and what happened is that a developer copied sample code (including the license). The code is significantly different than the original sample so I have corrected the license (in the new tarball and src.rpm). No problem with the vendor tag - in both spec files. I'm not exactly sure what your question is about eclispe(-platform) being licensed at EPL and policycoreutils at GPLv2+. eclipse-slide wouldn't need to match the license of any of the code it is dependant on. Spec URL (same as before): http://oss.tresys.com/projects/slide/browser/trunk/build/SPEC/eclipse-slide.spec SRPM URL (new):ttp://oss.tresys.com/projects/slide/chrome/site/srpm/eclipse-slide-1.3.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review