https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453 --- Comment #7 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #6) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5) > > > %files > > > %license LICENSE.txt > > > %doc docs/CREDITS.txt docs/README.txt > > > %{_bindir}/playsound > > > %{_libdir}/libSDL2_sound.so.2{,.*} > > > > Can you please split out playsound into a subpackage so that this is > > multilib safe? > > rpm uses file-coloring, so it is allowed to have /usr/bin/foo in both the > i686 and x86_64 package and to install both at the same time; and it is tiny. > > I do see that the SDL1 SDL_sound package also installs a /usr/bin/playsound, > which actually is a problem. Maybe rename the SDL2 one to playsound2? Or > given that the SDL_sound (v1) version is obsolete submit a PR to rename that > one out of the way? Maybe instead just remove the binary from SDL_sound, since this effectively replaces that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069453 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
