Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotail - An inotify-enabled tail replacement Alias: inotail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413321 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-12-06 07:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > do we need to care about CFLAGS here? > > Oops, forgot that. > > > man page is not following upstream timestamp. > > > > Not sure what you mean by this. The man page is part of the archive, rpmbuild > gzips it during install. > I guess its not needed( only for copying commands in SPEC) as per said in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab I see no issues with new SPEC. rpmlint is clean source matched upstream 82d4d05f86d6069e95c4b73e4004f15f inotail-0.5.tar.bz2 Packaging look good. APPORVED. Also, You may like to add disttag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review