Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mmaslano@xxxxxxxxx | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-05 08:46 EST ------- Hi Marcela, + Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. + Rpmline output is sane. + Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) + Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. (GPLv2+) + Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. (4bc30577e619e05252d394d51dc20747) + Package must own all directories that it creates. + Package does not contain duplicates in %files. + Permissions on files are set properly. + Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} + Latest version is packaged. - Package does not compile in mock. You forgot to include autoconf and automake as BuildRequires, but also flex. w/o autotools: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=275886&name=build.log w/ autoools: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=275917&name=build.log Please fix these issues and let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review