https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040728 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > I built a xtrkcad-doc rpm (5+Mb) for the docs and put the parameter files (1Mb) in the main rpm. > Do you think this should be done differently? I focused too much on the install size. The docs are 17MiB unpacked and the parameter files are 6MiB unpacked. The parameter files could be moved to a third, separate sub-package. But since they seem to compress nicely, and the main package is just 1.6MiB, I don't think that's necessary. I think this is good to go now. PACKAGE APPROVED. > What is the next step for me in this process? Take a look at the linked guide - you've just completed step six. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_Existing_Contributors/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040728 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
