https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031226 --- Comment #5 from W. Michael Petullo <mike@xxxxxxxx> --- Go packages do not seem to have the discipline of C libraries. Hugo does indeed need some of the features of this newer version of this toml package, namely: toml.DecodeError x.AsTime I guess the questions is how to package two revisions of a package API. I am not sure if all of the packages that rely on the existing toml package could use this version instead. It seems there are a few packages that depend on the existing toml package: nf repoquery --whatrequires golang-github-pelletier-toml-devel Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:00 ago on Sat 12 Mar 2022 01:46:17 PM CST. containerd-devel-0:1.5.5-1.fc35.noarch containerd-devel-0:1.6.0-1.fc35.noarch golang-gitea-lunny-nodb-devel-0:0-0.3.20210111git3238c46.fc35.noarch golang-github-astaxie-beego-devel-0:2.0.0~beta-3.20220206git093f976.fc35.noarch golang-github-aws-sdk-2-devel-0:1.8.0-1.fc35.noarch golang-github-containerd-stargz-snapshotter-devel-0:0.7.0-2.fc35.noarch golang-github-gohugoio-hugo-devel-0:0.80.0-2.fc34.noarch golang-github-gohugoio-hugo-devel-0:0.80.0-4.fc35.noarch golang-github-gosidekick-goconfig-devel-0:1.3.0-2.fc35.noarch golang-github-istio-viper-devel-0:1.3.2-3.20200908git8c945bc.fc35.noarch golang-github-ledisdb-devel-0:0.6-3.20210112gitd35789e.fc35.noarch golang-github-nicksnyder-i18n-devel-1:1.10.1-6.fc35.noarch golang-github-peterbourgon-ff-3-devel-0:3.0.0-3.fc35.noarch golang-github-peterbourgon-ff-3-devel-0:3.1.2-1.fc35.noarch golang-github-spf13-viper-devel-0:1.10.1-1.fc35.noarch golang-github-spf13-viper-devel-0:1.7.1-3.fc35.noarch golang-mongodb-mongo-driver-devel-0:1.4.5-3.fc35.noarch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031226 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
