https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051874 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #15 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jan Macku from comment #14) > So ifcfg-devname binary subpackage should be licensed like: > > > License: GPLv3 or ASL 2.0 or MIT > > Fabio, am I correct? No, that is definitely wrong. The binary will contain code from projects that are GPLv3 **and** from projects with other licenses (not **or**). Running the script I provided for you yields this list of licenses for the crate dependencies: - ASL 2.0 or MIT - MIT - MIT or ASL 2.0 - Unlicense or MIT (plus GPLv3 for the crate itself). So the license of the binary would be: - GPLv3 (for code from this crate itself) - (ASL 2.0 or MIT) and MIT and (MIT or ASL 2.0) and (Unlicense or MIT) for the dependencies The second item obviously simplifies to "MIT". So the binary package should have: License: GPLv3 and MIT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051874 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
