[Bug 2054708] Review Request: libarrow - Apache Arrow library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054708



--- Comment #6 from Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
> The plasma-* subpackages conflict with KDE software in Fedora. What should
> we do here?

What's your definition of conflict?

someone might look at the names and mistakenly assume the libarrow plasma-*
packages are part of kde, but there are no actual collisions in the names.

These are the names the Apache people chose when they packaged them at
https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/centos/8/x86_64/Packages/ and
https://apache.jfrog.io/ui/native/arrow/centos/8/Source/SPackages/ (And
obviously they didn't consult with Fedora or KDE when they chose them.)

I have no particular attachment to any of the names they chose. They could just
as easily be libarrow-plasma-* (and libarrow-parquet-*) AFAIC, apart from the
fact that people who are already consuming libarrow have been using them by the
names they have now.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054708
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux