https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918275 --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Benjamin Berg from comment #6) > Huh, I completely forgot about this. AFAIK, the package has been ready for a > long time. It just needs pushing out and then killing off the libusb package. > > But, a bit late for the F36 cycle (in particular because I really need to do > more stuff around libusb1 ATM). In particular as pushing it will trigger > FTBFS situations where packagers need to decide whether to depend on libusb1 > or libusb-compat-0.1. > > So, I would say, the best thing is to import this into rawhide after F36 > beta has frozen. I agree this is probably rawhide only material, but once you've fixed the libusb1-1.0.25-4 breakage, then you can start working on this right away, since F36 has already branched of from rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918275 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
