Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-03 14:19 EST ------- I'll look more closely after work, but I can note now that the COPYING file is simply the usual GPL notice and does not indicate which version of the GPL the sources are under. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing and specifically the statement: " A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. " So what I'm not finding is any statement in the source or documentation indicating just what version of the GPL this program is under. Or at least I hadn't, but now I see that netdump-server.8 includes comments (not visible in the formatted output) with a proper GPL notice saying "version 2 or later". So if that's to believed, then the proper License: tag should contain "GPLv2+". But honestly that's not the best place for the only license notice to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review