https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #14) . > > Why? Ideally we'd be able to expand our ffmpeg over time... Not what is concern disabled software as there are enough cases of fedora We (as rpmfusion) do not want to complement this package as this will break many software expecting full (upstream, non disabled) ffmpeg at runtime to not crash. Also, we don't want to back the remote work of making this package compatible to the non-replacement policy of rpmfusion. So because of that, I'm going to suspend the non replacement policy if ever this unbacked package is accepted as ffmpeg. I'm personally emotionally exhausted by this kind of felony toward our project (rpmfusion) sustainability. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
