Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyxml - A simple, small, C++ XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407571 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-12-02 14:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I really do not want to use lib%{name}.so.0.fedora, thats just too ugly for > words. I don't care about the precise soname, as long as it isn't something upstream is likely to use in the future. > Upstream's intention is for this to be included with other sources, they > do not even offer a Makefile to build a .a, so the chances of there ever > coming an official .so are small. They may change their mind. > Also most likely I'll change the soname to lib%{name}-%{version}.so with the > first new upstream version, as I expect them to not care about ABI's and > hapily break it each release (its really easy to cause ABI breakage with > c++). But I'm using lib%{name}.so.0 for now in the hope that they will > pleasantly surprise me. Using the lib%{name}-%{version}.so scheme would seem better to me since hopefully upstream won't do that. In my opinion it is better to anticipate rather than deal with later complexity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review