https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318 --- Comment #7 from Filip Januš <fjanus@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for your attention. There was a quite big discussion in my team a few months ago and compatibility requirements are present in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831941. But long story short, RHEL 8 version cant be updated due to compatibility and we also want to follow the request for the latest versions. The easiest way how to satisfy such requirements was considered EPEL. From the name point of view, I wanted to discuss it in fedora-devel but there wasn`t a clear response. So From my point of view autoconf27 using for the autoconf27.x versions is the best option. If you see any other issue I would like to discuss it , but from the compatibility side autoconf27.x perfectly fit into our problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
