[Bug 2005318] Review Request: autoconf27 - updated autoconf package with suitable name for EPEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318



--- Comment #7 from Filip Januš <fjanus@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for your attention. There was a quite big discussion in my team a few
months ago and compatibility requirements are present in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831941. But long story short, RHEL
8 version cant be updated due to compatibility and we also want to follow the
request for the latest versions. 
The easiest way how to satisfy such requirements was considered EPEL. From the
name point of view, I wanted to discuss it in fedora-devel but there wasn`t a
clear response. So From my point of view autoconf27 using for the autoconf27.x
versions is the best option. If you see any other issue I would like to discuss
it , but
from the compatibility side autoconf27.x perfectly fit into our problem.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux