https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318 --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Filip Januš from comment #4) > Neal we can discuss it but "autoconf2.71" I didn`t find it as the best > option. This package was intended due to epel. There is the requirement to > add the latest Autoconf. So for the update to the next release will be not > necessary to create a new package. The versioned package guidelines of Fedora apply here, which is why I say you should make that change *now* and make sure it works. For sure it's effectively a forward compatibility package rather than a backward compatibility one, but we're doing *exactly* the same thing with OpenSSL 3.x in EPEL 8: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl3/blob/epel8/f/openssl3.spec I'd rather you do it right up front rather than being forced to fix it later when someone realizes this happened. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005318 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
