https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044620 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Girko <ol+redhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4) > Thanks, I'll try to review the latest version tomorrow, but I assume it can > be approved. The only difference besides version bump and requested changes is one more patch to fix libpq include that the author changed to something specific to his system in the latest version. > Have you done any reviews of others' packages? If not, could you do a review > of one or two packages from > https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/reviewable.html? > (You can't approve the review before you are in the packager group, so for > now please > say that the review is informal.) I was participating in package reviews before. Like this, for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 I'll take a look at packages for review, and if I find something that's I'm interested in, I'll definitely participate as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044620 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
