https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042043 --- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga <mattia.verga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2) > The main question that comes to my mind here is: if INDI declares those > libraries as "3rdparty", why are you using INDI as the upstream here? Are > the original upstream projects dead? Does INDI require non-upstream > modifications to the libraries? Not sure about that. I suppose INDI provides the libraries to assure compatibility with the drivers it provides. Besides of that, both libindi and libfli (the only two libraries included here) upstreams seem long time dead (the core code seems not touched since years). Also Debian folks use INDI 3rdparty as upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042043 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
