https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981493 Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review? Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Still interested in this review? %{nameAPI} is not necessary I think. If incompatible changes appear in the code, dependent package have to adjust. If they do at the same time, there is little benefit of major version being part of every subpackage. If that changes, dependent packages have to adjust all dependencies. It is required on Debian, but not recommended practice on Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981493 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
