https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006765 Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIGNED |POST --- Comment #5 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I don't like your attitude. You refuse even simple improvements to spec file, because it is not mandatory. Well, it is not mandatory for me as a reviewer to give you review+. I have seriously considered just unassigning myself and leaving such review to someone else. You were helpful to me when I were playing with Raspberry Pi on fedora-arm channel. I would finish the review as thanks for that. But I don't think I requested something extra. I would not finish it for someone else. I think rebase and sftp fedorapeople.org; mput *.spec is not too much to ask. I think having fedpkg local --with check prepared for rebases is useful. I would want to have it in my package, but you would maintain this package. It would simplify basic test on a real device. Passing the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006765 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
