https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037863 Milan Crha <mcrha@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx, | |mcrha@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Milan Crha <mcrha@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3) > In my opinion, Milan is wrong to make you create a new package. Well, the two versions are parallel installable, but cannot be used from a single binary. I see a similarity with gtk2/gtk3/gtk4, or enchant/enchant2. You still want to allow build against libsoup2 - I understood the compat packages are only for runtime, at least mostly/usually. I can be wrong, of course. There is a slow ongoing effort to port applications (and their dependencies) to libsoup3 [1], but no hurry on that side. It's tricky, because the dependencies can be indirect (your dependency can use libsoup3, but a library it uses, which uses another library, is not ported or built to libsoup3). Once *all* the applications and libraries are ported the libsoup2 will eventually be removed from the Fedora, but that too far in the future at the moment. Michael (CC'ed) might have some more insight on the effort of getting libsoup3 into Fedora. [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/218 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037863 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
