[Bug 2010999] Review Request: gnome-text-editor - A simple text editor for the GNOME desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010999



--- Comment #7 from Link Dupont <link@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #6)
> > This is necessary because these libraries have soft-ABI breakage each GNOME cycle, so it is occasionally necessary to constrict them this way.
> 
> I don't know about enchant, but glib2, gtk4, and gtksourceview5 should all
> be API stable for the life of the package. glib2 has been stable for 20+
> years. Sure some small things may change, but I don't think explicit
> Requires is helpful.

What do the rest/majority of the GNOME application packages do? This should
follow the same pattern.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010999
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux