[Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2007-11-29 12:55 EST -------
This package seems acceptable to me except for 2 things:

1. the kpathsea library in fact call the kpse* executables, so I think
  there should be, for kpathsea:

Requires: texlive-fonts

2. there is a real issue regarding installation order/postscripts
  run order. I didn't get a lot of responses on fedora-devel-list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-October/msg00488.html

The issue with postscripts order is that (for example) updmap-sys 
should be run only after texlive, texlive-texmf, texlive-fonts, 
texlive-texmf-fonts and kpathsea have been installed, though I am
not sure that it is what happens.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]