https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029711 --- Comment #7 from Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6) > > - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided > > in the spec URL. > > Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in > > /home/ngompa/2029711-libzbd/diff.txt > > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ > > The difference here seems to be based on autofoo goop. You should consider > uploading your autotools generated tarballs to your GitHub releases and > pointing the Source URL to that. > > > [!]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. > > The GUI tools should have desktop files so that they're accessible from the > desktop environments. > > See: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_desktop_files I addressed both problems with version 2.0.2. Please check ! Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029711 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
