https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033083 --- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Major Hayden 🤠 from comment #1) > rpmlint is complaining about the license (MIT-0) and a lot about > cross-directory hardlinks, but this looks okay for the package. > > Good to go! ✅ Thanks! For posterity: - MIT-0 is on the official Good Licenses list [1], and rpmlint is just not in sync. - A comment in the spec files mentions that the cross-directory hardlinks are OK because they are all within a package-owned directory, so they are guaranteed to be all on the same filesystem. (Plus, rpmlint would complain just as loudly about the duplicate files if I did not hardlink.) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033083 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
