https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028876 Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal) CC| |code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(saroy@xxxxxxxxxx) --- Comment #1 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- The fedora-legal mailing list thread linked in the spec file, https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/OHECHDPLDJ7LLFUZXQMBBAXEXYTQMXOR/, concluded that the license was not acceptable in Fedora. A previous review request by a different packager, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767234, was closed for this reason. It seems like this is a clear-cut case of “the license is bad,” but I’m setting NEEDINFO just in case I missed something. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028876 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
