https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029963 Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Another package you maintain, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-ppft, is a fork of this one. It seems to be actively maintained, and provides the “ppserver” command and a compatible “pp” package. Adding “%py_provides python3-pp” to that package will make it provide python3-pp/python3.10-pp, but still not “python3dist(pp)”. It seems like patching dependency metadata from ppft to pp in dependent packages where required is probably a better approach than unretiring this package, especially given the multiple file conflicts that would result. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029963 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure