https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017119 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The spec file looks really good now. However, we still need to fix a couple of things that fedora-review tool discovered. The checksum for the .tar.gz that you baked into your .src.rpm has a different checksum than this file https://github.com/minfrin/retry/archive/retry-1.0.4/retry-1.0.4.tar.gz CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 98abe614ef43fb31c99c7e941cddf3df0527361dc81be395066831eb6e1e7515 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e7ab48923fd91aa2c5397cb2db4907a486176a582efe892a2113c9b91655f1e8 In fact, they are totally different tarballs. If you extract the SRPM file using this command `rpm2cpio ./retry-1.0.4-1.fc36.src.rpm | cpio -i` and explore the tarball, you can see that there are different files than in the upstream tarball. Rpmlint also discovered this retry.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0-1 ['1.0.4-1.fc36', '1.0.4-1'] Basically, your 1.0.4 version is not mentioned in the changelog. Also, when you make updates to a specfile, don't forget to bump the release number and add a new changelog entry :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017119 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
