[Bug 1938451] Review Request: stellarsolver - The Cross Platform Sextractor and Internal Astrometric Solver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938451

Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(pemensik@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |



--- Comment #15 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
I think most of these changes do not affect linux builds at all. There are
changes to astrometry, but most of them are changes made to enable compilation
on WIN32 platform. Such changes are not important to us. I admit in current
form bundled(astrometry) might be needed. But I think work to enable direct use
of astrometry library should be done. I think it IS possible and no major
changes would be required. But some would be. I think any changes needed should
be proposed to astrometry project [1], which seems still active.

I have not checked sep project [1] changes too much, but it seems active too.
Its changes seems more heavy and unpatched upstream does not provide all
required functionality. I would propose supplying also versions to Provides:
bundled(astrometry) = 0.76 and comment current source is incompatible with
existing package astrometry. Confirmed by upstream [2].

I think upstream maintainer might be able to provide also sep version [3],
which were imported into stellarsolver library. It should be obvious they are
much older than current versions. It should be noted both are modified and not
compatible without additional work. I think some bug should be kept open to
merge all required changes to astrometry.net directly, but they are not trivial
enough to block whole review for them.

Please fill a new review to finish inclusion. Expect I would request astrometry
package reuse even for a passed package. But that might require multiple pull
requests later. I guess we first want kstars to be updated and then can try
improving its dependencies to reuse existing code.

1. https://github.com/dstndstn/astrometry.net
2. https://github.com/rlancaste/stellarsolver/issues/84#issuecomment-976086875
3. https://github.com/kbarbary/sep


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938451
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux