[Bug 2020883] Review Request: kalendar - A calendar application using Akonadi to sync with external services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020883

Onuralp SEZER <thunderbirdtr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(thunderbirdtr@fed |
                   |oraproject.org)             |



--- Comment #13 from Onuralp SEZER <thunderbirdtr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Maxwell G from comment #12)
> Hi Onuralp,
> 
> I have a couple more pointers. I will approve your package once everything
> is fixed. In retrospect, I should have done that in the first place.
> 
> (In reply to Maxwell G from comment #11)
> > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> >     Note: Directories without known owners:
> >     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable,
> >     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor
> >
> >     I think you should add 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme`. Admittedly, I'm not super sure about this issue.

I added hicolor-icon-theme instead of owning (easier and cleaner)

> I confirmed that you need to own those icon directories. One option is to
> add `Requires: hicolor-icon-theme`. You can alternatively put `%dir
> $unowned_directory` in the `%files` section for each of the unowned
> directories. I prefer the former, but both solutions are valid.
> 
> > appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{buildroot}%{_metainfodir}/org.kde.%{name}.appdata.xml
> 
> > %files -f %{name}.lang
> > [...]
> > %{_kf5_datadir}/metainfo/org.kde.kalendar.appdata.xml 
> > [...]

kf5_metainfodir done

> You should use %{_kf5_metainfodir}[1] instead of `%{_metainfodir}` or
> `%{_kf5_datadir}/metainfo`.


I'm gonna keep it 

> > License:        GPLv3+
> 
> I don't think this is required, but I recommend adding a comment above the
> `License` field in your specfile linking to or paraphrasing my previous
> comment about licensing[2] to avoid any confusion down the line.
> 
> Thanks,
> Maxwell
> 
> [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kf5/blob/rawhide/f/macros.kf5#_9
> [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020883#c1


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020883
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux