[Bug 1980723] Review Request: fluent-bit - Fast data collector for Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723



--- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ben Kircher from comment #8)
> Hey, thanks for reviewing!
> 
> > * Why do we "BuildRequires: systemd"? Generally pulling in systemd itself isn't needed.
> 
> Fixed.
> 
> > * You're not following the guidelines for systemd units
> 
> Fixed this. Hope this looks good now.
> 
> > * Why was the shared library removed? The problem with it is that it needs a soname configured in CMake so that some kind of API/ABI stability promise exists. Without the shared library, the headers are not very useful, since there's nothing to link to.
> 
> True.
> 
> Puhh, OK, this is about the plugins. From what I can see: The unversioned
> shared library is used by plugins. The fluent-bit binary itself does not
> link against the shared library.
> 
> Plugins are loaded with dlopen(3)/dlsym(3) by the fluent-bit binary itself.
> There is also support for writing plugins in Go when -DFLB_PROXY_GO=On is
> set (which we don't here). Those Go plugins probably need that shared
> library, too.
> 
> 
> I'm not really interested in writing plugins or using any. So if possible I
> would drop the devel package (not sure this is OK with packaging guidelines?)
> 
> At the same time I would open an issue in upstream GH and ask friendly for a
> set_target_properties(SOVERSION …) to be added to their CMake files. At the
> same time for those header files all to be put under under a common
> fluent-bit directory. As soon this is done, I could add a devel package.
> 
> What do you think?
> 

That's fine with me.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux