https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022907 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3) > Conflicts with base packages are not allowed in EPEL, so you're going to > need to make adjustments to eliminate the conflicts in all the generated > packages. > > That includes renaming the binaries to have a "3" suffix, adjusting all the > file paths to not conflict, etc. > > You can see an incomplete example of this for the EPEL7 openssl11 package: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssl11/blob/ > db04e041f681575aab2a322512dd612c53b1106f/f/openssl11.spec#_420-456 > > In your case, you'll also need to deal with the Perl stuff too, since it's > different in OpenSSL 3. Thanks, I'll rework this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2022907 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
