[Bug 2017476] Review Request: dqlite - Embeddable, replicated and fault tolerant SQL engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017476

Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |POST
                 CC|                            |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License,
     Version 3", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "FSF All
     Permissive License", "GNU Lesser General Public License", "MIT
     License". 124 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in
     /home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
     present.
     Note: Package has .a files: dqlite-static.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
     See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
     guidelines/#_use_rpmlint
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 2.12 starting (python version = 3.9.7, NVR =
mock-2.12-1.fc34)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
INFO: Signal handler active
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 2.12
INFO: Mock Version: 2.12
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s):
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-debugsource-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-devel-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-debuginfo-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-static-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/
--releasever 36 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local
--disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-debugsource-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-devel-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-debuginfo-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
/home/reviewer/fedora/rawhide/2017476-dqlite/results/dqlite-static-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts



Rpmlint
-------
Checking: dqlite-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          dqlite-devel-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          dqlite-static-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          dqlite-debuginfo-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          dqlite-debugsource-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          dqlite-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.src.rpm
dqlite.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Embeddable -> Embedded
dqlite.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US failover -> fail over,
fail-over, spillover
dqlite-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
dqlite-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
dqlite.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Embeddable -> Embedded
dqlite.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US failover -> fail over,
fail-over, spillover
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.




Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/canonical/dqlite/archive/v1.9.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
b3f23019bcdc030b8f1d97ef585a34b24128414d6c2e79fcf729e053578d80a7
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
b3f23019bcdc030b8f1d97ef585a34b24128414d6c2e79fcf729e053578d80a7


Requires
--------
dqlite (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libraft.so.0()(64bit)
    libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit)
    libuv.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

dqlite-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    dqlite(x86-64)
    libdqlite.so.0()(64bit)

dqlite-static (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    dqlite(x86-64)

dqlite-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

dqlite-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
dqlite:
    dqlite
    dqlite(x86-64)
    libdqlite.so.0()(64bit)

dqlite-devel:
    dqlite-devel
    dqlite-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(dqlite)

dqlite-static:
    dqlite-static
    dqlite-static(x86-64)

dqlite-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    dqlite-debuginfo
    dqlite-debuginfo(x86-64)
    libdqlite.so.0.0.1-1.9.0-0.1.fc36.x86_64.debug()(64bit)

dqlite-debugsource:
    dqlite-debugsource
    dqlite-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2017476
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Ocaml, SugarActivity, fonts, PHP, R, Python, Perl, Haskell,
Java
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017476
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux