[Bug 2009214] Review Request: mingw-qt6-qtlocation - Qt6 for Windows - QtLocation component

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214



--- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> ---
So I'd say let's go with LGPLv3 or GPLv2 as base license.

Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-qt6-qtlocation.spec
SRPM URL:
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-qt6-qtlocation-6.2.0-3.fc36.src.rpm

%changelog
* Tue Oct 26 2021 Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> - 6.2.0-3
- Base license is LGPLv3 or GPLv2


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux