https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008090 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel <krebbel1@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #5) > I think the passing of -march=z14 will need some thinking, because I see 2 > kinds of gcc command lines > > gcc -O3 -march=z14 -mzvector -Wall -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector-all -O2 > -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe > -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 > -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 > -march=zEC12 -mtune=z13 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables > -fstack-clash-protection -march=z14 -funroll-loops "-Wall" -I ../zdnn -I . > -fPIC -c init_ztensor.c -o obj/init_ztensor.o > > and > > gcc -O3 -mzvector -Wall -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector-all -O2 -flto=auto > -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall > -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS > -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong > -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -march=zEC12 -mtune=z13 > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -march=z14 "-Wall" > -fPIC -c zdnn_init.c -o obj/zdnn_init.o > > The first one has -march=z14 twice, the second has one occurrence. The > "appended" -march overrides the distro wide flags, which is OK in the first > case, I think, but not in the second ... Good catch. The second must not have an -march=z14. I've added a patch to the srpm and pass CFLAGS_INIT to configure as well now. There I do not append -march=z14. The build command lines look ok with that change. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008090 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
