[Bug 2005989] Review Request: liborc- Apache ORC library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989



--- Comment #8 from Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #5)
> (In reply to Kaleb KEITHLEY from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2)
> > > There is already:
> > > 
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/orc
> > > 
> > > While there is no relation, wouldn't the liborc confuse with orc? 
> > 
> > I don't see how. orc does not have a liborc subpackage, and once or if (my)
> > liborc package exists it they would not be able to add one, right?
> 
> 
> I think there won't be anything stopping anybody to add `liborc` subpackage,
> unless they happen to know about `liborc` package.
> 

I can't stop people from making mistakes in the future.

You seem to want something. I'm not in the business of guessing what it is.

Can you please be specific about what you want so that I can consider it?


> 
> > > Or
> > > possibly collide (in the future). It certainly provides
> > > `liborc-0.4.so.0()(64bit)`, not sure what is the soname of this package.
> > 
> > Libraries:
> > * liborc-0.4 != liborc. I.e. liborc-0.4.so != liborc.so, liborc-0.4.a !=
> > liborc.a
> > 
> > and their SO_NAMEs:
> > * liborc-0.4.so.1 != liborc.so.1
> > 
> > There is no collision.
> 
> Probably not ATM.
> 
> 
> (In reply to Kaleb KEITHLEY from comment #4)
> > And yes, I checked when I started and found orc, and I considered the
> > libraries and SO_NAMEs. ;-)
> 
> Thx for pointing this out. I was not sure, therefore I thought it might be
> good idea to raise this concern just in case.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux