https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #116 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Warren Togami from comment #74) > * The bitcoin.service file bothers me in that a single system service is one > of many ways in which bitcoind is used. I'd prefer if it was a .service type > that allowed for multiple admin "@" definable instances. There could also be > a different .service file like "bitcoincore-homedir-service" that uses > $HOME/.bitcoin as the datadir in the way many have already deployed the > upstream binary? It is also my strong preference for the different types of > .service files to be in their own subpackage. That would also help the above > concern regarding a single hard-coded /etc/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf not being > how many use this software. This is part of the systemd user unit, and you can start it with all defaults (it just contains bitcoind without parameters): systemctl --user start bitcoin.service -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
