https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989 --- Comment #3 from Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > There is already: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/orc > > While there is no relation, wouldn't the liborc confuse with orc? I don't see how. orc does not have a liborc subpackage, and once or if (my) liborc package exists it they would not be able to add one, right? > Or > possibly collide (in the future). It certainly provides > `liborc-0.4.so.0()(64bit)`, not sure what is the soname of this package. Libraries: * liborc-0.4 != liborc. I.e. liborc-0.4.so != liborc.so, liborc-0.4.a != liborc.a and their SO_NAMEs: * liborc-0.4.so.1 != liborc.so.1 There is no collision. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005989 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
