https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999311 --- Comment #4 from Major Hayden 🤠 <mhayden@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #3) > I’ve also been recently reminded that pyproject-rpm-macros can handle > marking the license file in a lot of cases as part of pyproject_files, > although the manual “%license LICENSE” is not a problem, and there are a > handful of cases where it doesn’t work. You can check with “rpm -qL -p …”. > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pandas-flavor/pull-request/1 > for some discussion. This is one package where the “%license LICENSE” could > validly be omitted, although you can certainly leave it in (belt and > suspenders!). You are always a wealth of information, Ben! Thanks for your help. 😉 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999311 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
