https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990649 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Status|ASSIGNED |POST --- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Since the Apache 2.0 license is standardized and the MIT license text in the Pull Request matches what's used by other Rust crates under the MIT license, this looks good to me. Final review: Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. - package builds and installs without errors on rawhide - test suite is run and all unit tests pass - latest version of the crate is packaged - license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora - license file is included with %license in %files (and changes submitted to upstream) - package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. Consider removing the markdown markup from the package's Summary (backticks `) and from this bug's title, as they aren't rendered anywhere in the RPM ecosystem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
