https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990649 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Looks good with one exception: There's no license texts for both Apache-2.0 or MIT licenses. For Apache-2.0, it's not a big problem, since there's only "the one version", but there's over 20 different "MIT License" variants. Please open an issue with upstream that the license files are missing in both the upstream git repo, and in published crates (in fact, both Apache-2.0 and MIT licenses require that redistributed sources include license texts!). This would involve including LICENSE-APACHE & LICENSE-MIT files in the git repo, and adding "LICENSE-*" to the list of "include"d files in upstream's Cargo.toml. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
