Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: accrete - Accrete is a physical simulation of solar system planet formation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398051 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-11-25 08:42 EST ------- You also don't need to have setup written as %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} as source file name is same as %{name}-%{version} write it only as %setup -q Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. a8586ec1682cb9545ea380d78a8e83d1 accrete-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review