Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-24 17:57 EST ------- Good news first: installed texlive-* packages on a Fedora 8 system. Seems to work very well, lots of updated LaTeX packages etc. Thanks! The bad: $ yum update after adding texlive repo is not clean if you have tetex-doc installed. Nothing obsolete tetex-doc (don't even find texlive-doc package) and there are file conflicts between tetex-doc and mendexk: /usr/share/texmf/doc/mendexk/COPYRIGHT.jis /usr/share/texmf/doc/mendexk/ChangeLog /usr/share/texmf/doc/mendexk/README and tetex-doc and texlive: /usr/share/texmf/doc/ptex/ptex-src/Changes.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review