https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #79 from Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Warren Togami from comment #75) > Is there a benefit to 'utils' being a subpackage separate from `bitcoind`? > Many expect -cli to exist in order to manually send commands to their > bitcoind so it is unexpected for it to be installed separately IMO. > > I would expect the only reason to not ship them together is if it bloats a > minimal server with deps but that isn't the case? E.g. I run bitcoind at one host (to store this huge database inplace) and use bitcoin-cli in another hosts (without any bitcoin service). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
