https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985620 Igor Raits <igor.raits@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(igor.raits@gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #4 from Igor Raits <igor.raits@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #2) > Also the %python_provide macro is obsolete in Fedora (and the replacement, > %py_provides, is not needed for “conventionally-named” Python packages), so > it should be dropped. I'd prefer to have this specific package compatible with EPEL8. > As I understand it under > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text, you will have to wait for upstream to > add license text in response to > https://github.com/jeremyschulman/django3-auth-saml2/issues/10, or add what > you believe to be the correct license text yourself. It doesn’t seem like > packaging without license text is an option. I think it is fine for the time being… Esp. if upstream is not very responsive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
