https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #5) > Review tool gives me an installation error. [snip] > ``` > DEBUG util.py:444: No matches found for the following disable plugin > patterns: local, spacewalk > DEBUG util.py:446: fedora 27 kB/s > | 26 kB 00:00 > DEBUG util.py:446: updates 36 kB/s > | 19 kB 00:00 > DEBUG util.py:446: result 3.0 MB/s > | 3.0 kB 00:00 > DEBUG util.py:444: Error: > DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: conflicting requests > DEBUG util.py:444: - nothing provides fontawesome5-brands-fonts = > 5.15.4-1.fc34 needed by fontawesome5-fonts-all-5.15.4-1.fc34.noarch > DEBUG util.py:444: - nothing provides fontawesome5-free-fonts = > 5.15.4-1.fc34 needed by fontawesome5-fonts-all-5.15.4-1.fc34.noarch > DEBUG util.py:446: (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable > packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) > ``` > > Not sure if this is an problem or a fault positive, because i can reproduce > the error with my box when i install only the 3 mentioned packages. If i > install all packages from result dir everything seems to run well. That is weird. I don't know what fedora-review is trying to do there. The fontawesome5-fonts-all package has "all" in the name for a reason: it depends on the other fonts. Which were built. So why isn't fedora-review trying to install all of them??? As you note, the packages can all be installed manually, so there is nothing wrong with the dependencies. I don't know what happened. It looks like a fedora-review bug to me. > I am also wondering that fontawesome5-brands-fonts, fontawesome5-fonts-all, > fontawesome5-free-fonts are not mentioned in spec file. What magic happened > here? :) You are seeing the magic font macros at work! The %fontpkg macro generates fontawesome5-brands-fonts and fontawesome5-free-fonts from the %global settings above (%fontfamily1, %fontsummary1, etc.), and the %fontmetapkg macro generates fontawesome5-fonts-all from the unnumbered %global settings (%fontlicense, etc.). Down below, the %fontfiles macro generates %files sections for each of those packages. Also, speaking of fedora-review bugs, it issues a couple of bogus complaints; see bug 1996210. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
