https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901665 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(kwizart@xxxxxxxxx | |) | --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Ping. What's the state here? As my initially another review request was overwhelmed with this one any progress would be nice. Packaging is clean on the packaging wide.IMO. Only usability is to be proven. See next. > The only issue remains that to translate x86 linux binaries for arm, there is a need to install some x86 dependencies on the host. And if using fedora packages, then there is a path clash to be expected. (as x86 and arm libraries are using the same /usr/lib/ path). So this package looks very complex to use on the fedora side. (unless using x86 binary with only a deps on libc++). I only expect to build a dedicated chroot with x86 libraries and libstdc++ replaced by box86... This runtime test need to be proven for the package to be usable at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
