[Bug 1991208] Review Request: pluma-plugins - Modules for the pluma text editor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991208



--- Comment #4 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #2)
> I picked up your review. A font review shouln't be so difficult or not?

Well, I guess you are going to find out. :-)  I had a couple of people turn
that review down, due to feeling uncomfortable with font package reviews.

(In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #3)
> Since I started this just before it was taken, I'll add this as an informal
> review.

Thanks, Yaakov.  You caught a couple of things that I missed.  Here is my
review.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

Issues:
=======
- In a multiple licensing scenario, the license breakdown must be described:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_multiple_licensing_scenarios

  In this case, what is licensed LGPLv2+?  I only see the GPLv2+ in play.

- Add "%license COPYING" to %files.

- Note that Provides have been generated for two of the plugins:

  libbookmarks.so()(64bit)
  libwordcompletion.so()(64bit)

  Since they are in a private subdirectory of %{_libdir}, I don't think this is
  right.  Something like this in this specfile should prevent it:

  %global __provides_exclude_from ^%{_libdir}/pluma/plugins

- In %build, use "%make_build V=1" instead of the explicit make invocation. 
See
  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_parallel_make

- Look at the first item under "EXTRA items" below.  Is it possible to make
  a noarch subpackage to hold most or all of the files under /usr/share?

- Note the unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings in the rpmlint section
below.
  That indicates that this project has run afoul of a long-standing libtool
bug:
  it reorders -Wl,--as-needed *after* the libraries to be linked against,
  rendering it useless.  I usually put this between %configure and %make_build
  for projects that use libtool:

# Get rid of undesirable hardcoded rpaths; workaround libtool reordering
# -Wl,--as-needed after all the libraries.
sed -e 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' \
    -e 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' \
    -e 's|CC="\(.*g..\)"|CC="\1 -Wl,--as-needed"|' \
    -i libtool

  If you don't have rpath problems, then the 3rd sed expression may be all you
  need.

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.

     There is a COPYING file, but it is not included in the binary package.

[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.

     License field includes "LGPLv2+", but I don't see any files with those
     license terms.

[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
     Note: Multiple Release: tags found
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).

     The shared object plugins should not generate Provides.

[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

     Upstream did not provide any tests.

[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 3717120 bytes in /usr/share
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: pluma-plugins-1.26.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          pluma-plugins-debuginfo-1.26.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          pluma-plugins-debugsource-1.26.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          pluma-plugins-1.26.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
pluma-plugins.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpeas-loader-python3
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: pluma-plugins-debuginfo-1.26.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
rpmlint: 2.0.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 1

pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libpeas-gtk-1.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libharfbuzz.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libcairo-gobject.so.2
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libcairo.so.2
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so /lib64/libgirepository-1.0.so.1
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libgdk-3.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libharfbuzz.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libcairo-gobject.so.2
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libcairo.so.2
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so /lib64/libgirepository-1.0.so.1
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_tab_get_view 
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_message_bus_unregister_all   
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_message_has_key      
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_debug
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_view_get_type
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so
pluma_document_set_metadata(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_debug_message
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_message_bus_register 
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so
pluma_document_get_metadata(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_window_get_type      
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_tab_get_document     
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so
pluma_window_get_active_view(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so
pluma_window_get_ui_manager(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_document_get_type    
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_window_activatable_get_type  
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_message_bus_connect  
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_window_get_active_document   
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_message_get  
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so
pluma_window_get_message_bus(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so pluma_window_get_views     
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so pluma_debug   
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so pluma_view_get_type   
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so pluma_debug_message   
(/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so pluma_view_activatable_get_type  
     (/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so pluma_window_activatable_get_type
     (/usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so)
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: package-with-huge-docs:  72%
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/help/zu/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml
/usr/share/help/af/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/am/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/an/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ar/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/as/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ast/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/az/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/be/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/bg/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/bn/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/bn_IN/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/br/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/bs/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ca/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ca@valencia/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/cmn/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/crh/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/cs/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/csb/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/cy/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/de/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/dz/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/el/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/en_AU/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/en_CA/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/en_GB/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/eo/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_AR/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_CL/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_CO/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_CR/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_DO/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_EC/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_ES/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_MX/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_NI/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_PA/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_PE/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_PR/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xm
l:/usr/share/help/es_SV/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_UY/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/es_VE/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/et/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/eu/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/fa/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/frp/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/fur/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/fy/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ga/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/gu/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ha/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/he/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/hi/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/hr/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/hu/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/hy/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ia/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/id/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ig/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/is/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/jv/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ka/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/kab/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/kk/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/km/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/kn/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ko/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ks/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ku/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ky/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/la/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/lb/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/lt/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/lv/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/mai/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/mg/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/mk/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ml/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/mn/pluma-plugins/legal-plugi
ns.xml:/usr/share/help/mr/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/nds/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ne/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/nn/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/nso/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/oc/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/or/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/pa/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ps/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/pt/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/pt_BR/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ro/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ru/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/rw/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/sc/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/si/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/sk/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/sl/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/sq/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/sr@latin/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/sv/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/sw/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ta/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/te/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/th/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/tr/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ug/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/uk/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ur/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/ur_PK/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/uz/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/vi/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/wa/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/xh/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/yo/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/zh-Hans/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/zh_CN/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/zh_HK/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml:/usr/share/help/zh_TW/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/help/ie/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml
/usr/share/help/da/pluma-plugins/legal-plugins.xml
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-code-browser.png
/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-class.png
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-typedef.png
/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-define.png:/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-enumerator.png:/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-field.png:/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-macro.png
pluma-plugins.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-method.png
/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-function.png:/usr/share/pluma/plugins/sourcecodebrowser/icons/source-member.png
pluma-plugins.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpeas-loader-python3
================ 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 52 warnings, 1
badness; has taken 0.9 s =================



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
pluma-plugins: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libbookmarks.so
pluma-plugins: /usr/lib64/pluma/plugins/libwordcompletion.so

Requires
--------
pluma-plugins (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python3
    libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit)
    libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
    libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgirepository-1.0.so.1()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtksourceview-4.so.0()(64bit)
    libharfbuzz.so.0()(64bit)
    libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpeas-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpeas-gtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpeas-loader-python3
    pluma
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

pluma-plugins-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

pluma-plugins-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
pluma-plugins:
    libbookmarks.so()(64bit)
    libwordcompletion.so()(64bit)
    metainfo()
    metainfo(pluma-bookmarks.metainfo.xml)
    metainfo(pluma-codecomment.metainfo.xml)
    metainfo(pluma-synctex.metainfo.xml)
    metainfo(pluma-terminal.metainfo.xml)
    pluma-plugins
    pluma-plugins(x86-64)

pluma-plugins-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    libbookmarks.so-1.26.0-1.fc36.x86_64.debug()(64bit)
    libwordcompletion.so-1.26.0-1.fc36.x86_64.debug()(64bit)
    pluma-plugins-debuginfo
    pluma-plugins-debuginfo(x86-64)

pluma-plugins-debugsource:
    pluma-plugins-debugsource
    pluma-plugins-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1991208 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, C/C++, Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Ocaml, Java, PHP, fonts, SugarActivity, R, Perl, Ruby,
Haskell
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux