https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987298 Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(code@musicinmybra | |in.net) --- Comment #5 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > - There is no architecture-specific modification of these header files, right? > They're just installed exactly as they are in the souce tarball, I believe. > In that case, shouldn't the *-devel packages all be noarch? This is logical, but the packaging guidelines mandate and justify otherwise: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_do_not_use_noarch > - The stb_image_write-devel and stb_sprintf-devel descriptions each contain a > percent sign, which should be doubled to tell RPM they aren't macros. Thanks. I will fix this. > - Some of the compiler warnings indicate real problems. […] Thank you for the detailed analysis of particular issues. I will comb through the compiler warnings and offer patches upstream as needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
