https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992879 --- Comment #13 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #11) > Package approved. Thank you! > Can you double-check the BR on procps, and maybe add an explanatory comment > if it is actually needed? Way back in the mists of time, parallel used to invoke one of the procps tools, I don't remember which one, but didn't have a Requires on procps. There was a bug on that, which I can't seem to find at the moment, but it was ignored. I became accustomed to adding BR: procps in every spec file that had BR: parallel. Only that doesn't appear to be the case anymore. Great, I can hunt down all of my packages that do that and remove the BR: procps. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
