https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992879 Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(loganjerry@gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #9 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #8) > I’ve never used Pari-GP before, but it seems like you can run the included > test to validate the tables something like this: > > > BuildRequires: pari-gp > > > %check > > cp -p check do-check > > cat >> do-check <<'EOF' > > all() > > quit > > EOF > > gp --default parisizemax=400M do-check > > However, it took me about two hours to run that on an ARM-based laptop, so > it’s probably not worth it in the end, especially as there isn’t any > processing done on the sources during the build. Yeah, I think I'd prefer to not do that. :-) > I’m happy to go ahead and finish up the review, but it seems like the spec > and SRPM links are now 404. Are you looking at the URLs in comment 3, or the ones at the top of the bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
