Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4@xxxxxxxx 2007-11-23 12:46 EST ------- In fact updating my repo and creating the rpm for fedora 8 and fedora 7 and 8 on x86_64 I have found some errors about dependencies, this package has one of them, it should not include the require of Biostring or Bsgenome as these two packages required it to be compiled... once again a cyclic dependency. I have uploaded the corrected files SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.2.0-4.fc6.src.rpm > Did you find some more precise statement of the license somewhere? I have checked the latest version on Bioconductor 2.1 which (once again) do not contain any license file... (the version in Bioc 2.1 is the same that the one on Bioc 2.2) Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review